LETTER: Hidden significance of arms decommissioning
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Professor G. L. Huxley
Sir: Speaking at Ballymena on 21 December, the Prime Minister gave his hearers to understand that "decommissioning" - that is, the unilateral handing-in of some or all of their arms by the Provisional IRA - was a part of the Downing Street Declaration. Had Messrs Adams and McGuinness or any other member of Sinn Fein agreed to such decommissioning, there could hardly have been a "peace process" and their own expectations of survival would have been diminished. The emphasis upon decommissioning on the part of British politicians came later than the Declaration, at the behest of Ulster Unionists and of elements in the security forces in Northern Ireland.
Article 10 of the Declaration states:
The British and Irish Governments reiterate that the achievement of peace must involve a permanent end to the use of, or support of, paramilitary violence. They confirm that in these circumstances, democratically mandated parties which establish a commitment to exclusively peaceful methods and which have shown that they abide by the democratic process are free to join in dialogue in due course between the governments and the political parties on the way ahead.
Nothing is said, or implied, here about handing in of weapons.
A survey conducted in November 1994 revealed that there were 130,000 weapons legally held by loyalists. The numbers of illegally held weapons in possession of loyalists is not known. The British Government has yet to explain how loyalist arms are to be decommissioned. Insistence upon decommissioning in advance of political negotiations is therefore not reasonable, and the suggestion that decommissioning was part of the Declaration is deficient in veracity.
Yours faithfully,
George Huxley
Trinity College
Dublin
21 September
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments