Letter: Help for the young jobless
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Sir: Polly Toynbee, writing on welfare-to-work, asks: "Why make it compulsory, alienating the young instead of inspiring them?" Liberal Democrats are bound to wonder whether the answer is that Gordon Brown's newly tightened spending limits may make real quality impossible.
Opponents of compulsion may be asked: "Does the state owe us a living?" There is a good case for answering yes. The trade-off of citizenship is that the state owes us protection in return for our obedience. Since this includes protection against death from road accidents or food poisoning, why not death by starvation?
If the state deprives us of this protection then, in the very carefully chosen words of an MP speaking in the House of Commons on the eve of the Civil War: "The vigour and cheerfulness of allegiance will be taken away though the obligation remains."
Earl RUSSELL
Liberal Democrat Social Security Spokesman
House of Lords
London SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments