Letter: Health threat from river crossing

Mr John Austin-Walker,Mp
Sunday 23 May 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I was very pleased with your report ('Green groups unite to fight for woods', 11 May) on the threat to Oxleas Wood in Woolwich, my constituency. Obviously plans to destroy an ancient woodland and Site of Special Scientific Interest need to be opposed, but we should not lose sight of the other environmental damage that would follow construction of the East London River Crossing (ELRC).

Recent reports highlight the current effects of air pollution in the area. In the northern part of Woolwich, which will be bisected by ELRC, there are schools where half the children take regular anti-asthma medicine. The area has one of the highest rates of asthma and respiratory illness among children in London.

The proposed road would pass close to eight schools, five of which cater for children with special educational and health needs, including severe asthma, heart disease and cystic fibrosis. Even the Department of Transport admits that traffic on ELRC would generate an extra 1000 tonnes of gaseous and particulate pollution each year. That is why we are campaigning against the road and demanding a full Environmental Impact Assessment in accordance with EC Directive 85/337.

Yours sincerely,

JOHN AUSTIN-WALKER

MP for Woolwich (Lab)

House of Commons

London, SW1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in