Letter: Harsh consequences of mineral excavation

Mr Ben Plowden
Thursday 24 June 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

My recent work focusing on Latino voters in Arizona has shown me how crucial independent journalism is in giving voice to underrepresented communities.

Your support is what allows us to tell these stories, bringing attention to the issues that are often overlooked. Without your contributions, these voices might not be heard.

Every dollar you give helps us continue to shine a light on these critical issues in the run up to the election and beyond

Eric Garcia

Eric Garcia

Washington Bureau Chief

Sir: Nicholas Schoon's timely article and your leader on the plan to quarry away a mountain on Harris (23 June) highlight the consequences of the Government's commitment to meet the apparently inexorable rise in minerals demand. Despite the current review of national minerals policy, it is evident that this commitment remains firm.

To meet rising demand without exacerbating existing quarrying conflicts in areas such as the Mendip Hills, the Government is encouraging coastal superquarry development in Scotland and elsewhere. Rather than exporting the environmental consequences of minerals extraction from England and Wales, however, the Government should tackle the root cause of the problem.

This entails finding ways of reducing the demand for aggregates and encouraging society to be more 'minerals efficient'. Take John MacGregor's roads programme. The Council for the Protection of Rural England has recently published research suggesting that the minerals needed for the national roads programme up to 2025 would require a hole the size of Oxfordshire more than a metre deep. A similar calculation could be done for the number of Scottish mountains required.

Until the Government reduces the rate of road-building and develops other policies to make us more 'aggregates efficient', we can expect to see the tragedy on Harris played out many times.

Yours sincerely,

BEN PLOWDEN

Council for the Preservation of Rural England

London, SW1

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in