Letter: Haig reappraised
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: It is a pity that Jane Carter (letter, 10 March) has to spoil an admirable point and a moving family anecdote by going on to perpetuate the myths and ignorance that continue to surround the First World War.
Lord Haig did not send 'millions' to their deaths. Total British Empire deaths, covering all campaigns and including those in which Haig was not involved, totalled 908,000. The 10 million with no known grave mentioned by Professor Carter is clearly ludicrous given the fact that Britain mobilised just over eight million men in the course of the war.
Appalling though the figures are, British casualty rates were, if anything, less than those of other major combatants. As a general, Haig was no better or worse than the majority of his contemporaries, and it is by those standards that he should be judged.
Yours faithfully,
GRAEME MITCHELL
Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire
12 March
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments