LETTER : Goldsmith's private party
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Graham Watson
Sir: It is hard to compete with Sir James Goldsmith's millions, but his advertisement in yesterday's Independent cannot go unremarked. Extraordinary though it was, it was most notable for what it omitted. Throughout the text, Sir James is careful to gloss over the fact that one of the existing parties is in favour of a referendum - the Liberal Democrats.
We have repeatedly said that if next year's Inter-Governmental Conference produces recommendations for genuine constitutional change, then we would favour putting its proposals to the people.
So one has to ask, what is the point of Sir James's party? Why bother with a political party composed of self-confessed single-issue obsessives and political ingenues who are unlikely to win more than handful of votes in any seat?
Sir James's answer would no doubt be that, as a Europhile party, the Liberal Democrats could not be trusted to frame a referendum question that was, in his terms, "fair". But we, too, would consult with diverse and independent sources before setting the question. After all, a referendum would be self-defeating if its terms were widely held to lack popular legitimacy.
Yours faithfully
Graham Watson
MEP for Somerset and
North Devon (Lib Dem)
Strasbourg
25 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments