LETTER:Glass warfare at Sherborne

Mr Peter Cormack
Tuesday 25 July 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Peter Cormack

Sir: James Fenton is right to castigate the Church of England for its flawed attitude to our national heritage. Part of the problem is in clergy training.

Although almost all clergy will, at some point in their ministry, have historic buildings and works of art in their care, they receive no guidance on this aspect of their work at theological colleges. Indeed, the colleges have resolutely resisted any suggestion that this should be part of their job.

One would think that, at the very least, some awareness of the support available to parishes through government and other grants and expert advice would be helpful. However, all too often, hard-pressed clergy have to research this aspect of their job from scratch. Not surprisingly, this can induce a resentful attitude that sees heritage and conservation as problems rather than embodying the rich continuity of faith.

Until the Church of England takes its responsibilities seriously as a custodian of our most beautiful old buildings and their contents, its exemption from national planning controls will increasingly be seen as an unjustifiable and archaic privilege.

Yours faithfully,

Peter Cormack

London, NW9

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in