Letter: Geneticists' goal is to cure, not tyrannise

Saturday 24 July 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I DON'T wish to worry Richard Dawkins and all your butch, heterosexual male readers too much, but . . .

My maternal grandmother has been responsible for the production of 35 children. She herself had six girls, who produced the other 29 children of which there are 18 boys and 11 girls. One of the said 18 is incontrovertibly gay.

This gives rise to the intriguing question of how many of the other 17 may have that propensity. 'Ah,' you may cry, 'they are all married with children, so they're OK.' But the gay one has also been married and produced two children. Under the present hypothesis the gene will die out at this point because it is carried through the female line.

I have, of course, only presented a microcosm of the familial possibilities. I have a gay cousin, who has also been married and produced children, related to the gay in my immediate family through the male line. Therefore his homosexual gene was inherited from a totally different lot of females. Interestingly, our joint grandmother, on my paternal and his maternal line, produced 13 children, many of them girls and all prolific breeders.

I have not taken the trouble to ask any of my relatives embarrassing questions, nor have I taken steps to have them gened, if I may so put it. My conclusion is, though, that there is probably a lot of it about and many people are probably keeping mum.

Name and address supplied

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in