Letter: Gender judgment

Robert Montagu
Monday 26 February 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Robert Montagu

Sir: Why is it that every time British justice faces a new legal challenge on a moral issue, the High Court takes a protectionist stand? Is it because the judges prefer to leave all contentious decisions to the Court of Appeal or the House of Lords?

The decision not to allow men who have become women to change gender under their birth certificates must eventually be challenged in the European courts; and once again Britain will be seen as the reactionary, intellectually and morally weak man of Europe.

Yours sincerely,

Robert Montagu

Evershot, Dorset

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in