Letter: GCSE criticism that shakes students' confidence

Mr Peter Millar Hagerty
Wednesday 02 September 1992 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your assertion (leading article, 2 September) that the variation between examination boards in this country is a great weakness appears to ignore a greater strength.

At present the different examining boards provide schools and pupils with not only a selection of different syllabuses - particularly useful in subjects such as History or English Literature - but, perhaps more importantly, with a choice of different examining styles. One pupil may be better served by a strong bias towards coursework with short answers at examination time, while another will excel at producing critical essays under the pressure of the exam room. Both pupils may be equally knowledgeable, intelligent and diligent, and neither deserves to be penalised.

What is vital is that the level of knowledge required in a subject, both by the various examining boards and by individual boards from year to year, remains constant. Centralising the examination system would not necessarily achieve this, and by removing the element of choice would limit a school's ability to match the education to the pupil.

Yours faithfully

PETER MILLAR HAGERTY

London, SW10

2 September

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in