Letter: Gambling with Ally Pally

John Adams
Tuesday 28 May 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Gambling with Ally Pally

Sir: The Treasury Solicitor has emphasised the "risk" that Haringey has taken with its grandiose redevelopment of Alexandra Palace whose debt has spiralled out of control ("pounds 55m Ally Pally losses leave 20-year legacy of cuts", 27 May).

At the public inquiry into the scheme in 1982 Haringey promised that it would not put a penny on the rates. Confronted with the fact that the debt amounts to over 50,000 pennies for each rate payer, Toby Harris, the council leader, now declares that this ancient promise is "inoperative". Neither the Charity Commission nor the District Auditor, who should have put a cap on the debt years ago, can plead ignorance; they have been kept informed as the scandal has unfolded. But they too appear likely to escape unscathed.

Risk is unavoidable. If Haringey's gamble had paid off - improbable though that was given the evidence available at the time - they would have reaped the political benefit. But if there is never an equivalent penalty to be paid for getting it wrong, there is nothing to dissuade councillors from accepting the next one-way bet they are offered.

JOHN ADAMS

London WC1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in