Letter: Futility of learning by rote

John A. Cram
Thursday 06 June 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: "I can imagine the outcry from Ofsted if a school said `Sorry, we do not have time to teach music because we are concentrating on the basics' ", complains Peter Brinton (Letters, 4 June).

A Swiss survey of 1,200 seven to 15-year-olds (reported in New Scientist, 18 May) found that children who had five music lessons per week performed better at language, and no worse at maths, than children who had one or two music lessons per week - and were also better behaved.

More research may be needed, but this certainly undermines Mr Brinton's unwritten assumption that extra time spent on "the basics" is the best way to improve children's competence in them.

JOHN A CRAM

Leeds

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in