Letter: Funerary mysteries

Dr Gerald Hawting
Friday 18 September 1992 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Tim McGirk's interesting report on the changing attitude of some Parsees to the tradition of exposing the dead to be devoured by birds ('Shortage of vultures threatens ancient culture', 16 September) repeats a popular misconception.

The tradition did not originate as a result of Muslim persecution, and the Muslim rulers of Iran did not force the Zoroastrians to leave their dead unburied. In fact, Zoroastrians received a certain measure of toleration from the Muslims (in exchange for the payment of a special tax) and were accepted on a par with Christians and Jews as 'protected peoples'.

The practice in Iranian religion of exposing the dead to be eaten by animals and birds is much older than Islam and is attested by Herodotus in the fifth century BC. It is likely that it is a survival of a funerary practice that goes back to prehistoric times.

The custom is sometimes explained as a result of an unwillingness to pollute the sacred elements of earth, fire and water by contact with the dead, but such explanations are usually secondary rationalisations of social and religious practices, the origins of which are unknown.

Whether the Parsees will one day abandon their ritual only time will tell. The feeling of some Parsees against it perhaps reflects the influence of modern urban living and a sense of security that no longer makes it necessary to emphasise practices which, in the past, have distinguished the Parsees from the surrounding society.

Yours faithfully,

GERALD HAWTING

Head of Department of Religious Studies

School of Oriental and African Studies

London, WC1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in