Letter: Funding the theatre
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Thank you, Polly Toynbee (article, 10 November), for focusing attention on how the Lottery has become a poison chalice for the arts. But the issue is not "financing the arts" generally. The crisis affects the live performing arts.
Art that can be mechanically reproduced (books, films, videos, paintings, CDs) and object art in museums have no problem of financing or valuation. Backed by industries or, in the case of auction houses, a major element of our commercial life, they need no special government support.
The live performing arts are dead or dying because they cannot make a living wage from ticket sales for a physical event that is distorted or destroyed when subject to mechanical amplification. A playhouse has to be intimate - like the Greenwich Theatre. An opera house can be larger, but not much.
No theatre company in Britain now employs a company of actors on a year- round basis, whereas well over a hundred do so in Germany. Money for the arts at the local level is distributed by centrally funded remote quangos, which are naturally nervous about their impossible responsibility. But a theatre company needs a close relationship with its economic and social hinterland.
Even when local government was permitted to spend a penny rate on culture in the 1950s and 1960s, there was no obligation on it to do so. But the live performing arts should be recognised as being, just like universities, an essential element in our culture.
Constitutional reform being prepared by Mr Blair should include establishing a local government framework with a built-in obligation to rebuild the culture of the live performing arts and reconnect them to audiences (and electorates) that now, in most cases, simply do not know what they are missing.
TOM SUTCLIFFE
London SW16
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments