Letter: Funding the future of Scottish Ballet
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I cannot allow John Percival's account of the Scottish Arts Council's role in the debate over the future of Scottish Ballet ("He who pays the piper", 26 July) to stand unchallenged. We are, believe it or not, a relatively civilised organisation, and have spent our time trying to find ways of saving Scottish Ballet, not destroying it. More to the point, the article suggests that the whole discussion has taken place in an atmosphere of hostility and resentment, which is simply untrue.
It is absurd to claim that Scottish Ballet was somehow sidelined during our lengthy attempts to find a solution to the perennial financial problems of all four Scottish national companies. For the best part of a year, Scottish Ballet was intimately involved in the most detailed appraisal of an orchestra merger as well as administrative savings. The problems were endlessly addressed and discussed. It was recognised early on that the company might face additional costs through exchanging a part-time orchestra for a more permanent band; but it was agreed - and minuted - that any such costs would be made up from the overall savings we aimed to achieve. What, after all, would have been the point of coming up with a solution that rendered one company worse off than it had been before?
It was bitterly frustrating for the rest of us when Scottish Ballet, having agreed in principle to the scheme, backed out at the last minute, thus sacrificing the extra pounds 2.4m which the Scottish Office had promised the companies in the event of agreement. The pity of it is that at the orchestra level we knew it could work - and work well - for Scottish Ballet. I trust that the Board, having rejected our solution, can come up with a viable alternative. It is their proposals we will be studying at our next Council meeting. We shall do so with the ultimate objective of ensuring that Scottish audiences continue to be provided with ballet of the highest standard.
MAGNUS LINKLATER
Chairman, The Scottish Arts Council
Edinburgh
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments