LETTER: Freedom to limit animal suffering
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mrs Joan Haggard
Sir: Your article on genetic engineering, "Is this the work of man or nature?" (20 November) asks if there are any limits to what people can, and should, do to animals to further human ends. There certainly are, and I think they can best be defined by the Farm Animal Welfare Council's "Five Freedoms", which are equally applicable to all animals used by mankind for his advantage. They are:
1. Freedom from thirst, hunger and malnutrition.
2. Freedom from discomfort.
3. Freedom from pain, injury and disease.
4. Freedom to express normal behaviour.
5. Freedom from fear and distress.
A group of animals specifically created to develop cancer would not be free from discomfort, pain, disease or distress, and I doubt if they would be able to express normal behaviour.
Yours sincerely,
Joan Haggard
Harpenden, Hertfordshire
20 November
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments