Letter: Foreign markets
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Michael Littlechild
Sir: In his Economic View (22 February), Paul Wallace discussed the pros and cons of the UK's lead in foreign direct investment (FDI). He rightly stressed that Britain's well-known success in inward investment is matched by its less-publicised lead in outward investment. However, he finds the propensity of UK firms to seek greener pastures overseas perplexing.
His view underestimates how, in the vast majority of outward investment decisions, the objective of penetrating new markets is paramount over that of lowering production costs. In services, local "production" is usually unavoidable, sometimes for regulatory reasons but mainly for delivering the service to the customer with a responsiveness that competes with domestic suppliers.
Similarly, in many manufacturing sectors, customer responsiveness and just-in-time delivery requirements make local production essential for serious market penetration. Our experience of international investors, big and small, finds production costs to be a factor in a much smaller minority of cases than is commonly assumed.
Most British companies are not displacing domestic production when they invest abroad but are extending their markets. Outward investment in many industries is an essential entry route into foreign markets, which cross- border sales of domestic production could not replace.
Yours faithfully,
Michael Littlechild
KPMG
London, EC4
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments