Letter: For 'free' trade, read 'forced'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The suggestion that ferry companies might be legally obliged to carry animals for live transport to Europe ('Ferry companies buckle under public pressure over livestock', 20 August), on the grounds that to decline this business would restrain free trade, seems odd.
As far as I can tell, 'free trade' here means 'forced trade': if existing companies consider it unethical or against their interests to transport livestock across the Channel for slaughter, they should then be forced to do so, to keep trade free. Come again? Surely the point of a free market is that trades are voluntary, not compulsory.
I have noticed before in international trade talks (notably on the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, and within the European Union) this interesting idea that, because trade is 'a good thing', it must be maximised via any coercion necessary. Am I the only one to whom this fore- shadows a new era of centrally planned economies - this time, with transnational trading bodies doing the planning?
If so, it will surely end in as many ethical, environmental and economic tears as the Soviet experiment. We need to take a long, hard look at this modern orthodoxy misnamed 'free trade', whilst we yet retain enough freedom to affect its development.
Yours sincerely,
GRAHAM WOODLAND
London, NW10
20 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments