Letter: Food agency

Maya Kraus
Tuesday 25 November 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The possibility that the Food Standards Agency could be prevented from looking at issues of nutrition is a worrying development ("Food lobby jeopardises drive for healthy eating", 24 November).

To rational and concerned citizens, the expected role of our much-needed food watchdog must be to look at the related questions of quality, purity and nutrition and to make representations on our behalf to government and manufacturers alike on these issues.

Just where would the (artificial) line between the issues be drawn? By way of example, many asthma sufferers appear to be allergic to bread made from North American wheat, which is used predominantly in our bread, but not to many types of bread made with European flour. Is this a question of purity, because of the anti-fungicide added to North American wheat before shipping; is the allergy caused by something which our own bakers add, or by different types of grain; or should we look at the volume of bread in our national diet? Questions of food quality and nutrition inevitably overlap - and why should they not be looked at together?

The politicians and their civil servants at the ministries of Health and Agriculture will still have responsibility for blocking or implementing any legislative changes recommended by the FSA - but at least give the new agency a sporting chance to carry out the citizens' watchdog role which our ministerial representatives (of whichever political hue) have sadly failed to deliver.

MAYA KRAUS

Director

Guildford Natural Health Centre

Guildford, Surrey

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in