Letter: Flexible labour or cheap labour?

Lois Stewart
Monday 11 March 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your report "Flexible jobs seen as future face of labour" (8 March) suggests that in 10 years' time half the workforce will be working "flexibly", that is on short-term contracts, self-employed or part-time.

One great advantage to employers is that part-timers' pay is lower than full-timers, and since most part-timers are women, the labour force is even cheaper. In Great Britain, part-time women workers' pay is only 75 per cent of full-time women workers, and only 58 per cent of male full- timers. We will see a vast increase in the pool of cheap labour

Lois Stewart

International Confederation of Free Trade Unions

Brussels

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in