Letter: Fighting MiG fire with MiG fire
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: A principal argument currently being used in favour of continuing the European Fighter Aircraft (EFA) project seems to be that, despite the end of the Cold War, we may still find ourselves confronting the latest-version MiGs that Russia will be obliged to sell to Third World countries.
Surely the answer is obvious - scrap the EFA and equip the RAF with MiGs. They will probably be half the cost of aircraft built in high-wage countries; the order will stabilise the Russian economy and in particular stave off the politically dangerous collapse of its military-industrial sector; and it will keep the aircraft out of unstable Third World hands as well.
Rarely is a government presented with a policy opportunity of such universal benefit.
Yours sincerely,
MARTIN SLATER
Oxford
3 July
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments