Letter: Feeling good with fewer people
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Why should a falling population after the year 2020 give the chancellor of the day a "feel-bad problem?" ("Feel-bad factor predicted as population falls", 22 March). A slowly falling population would naturally lead to a disappearing housing shortage and falling costs, together with falling unemployment, reduced congestion, reduced pollution, and a falling import bill. The pressures of intensive farming on food quality and wildlife could more easily be reduced. It would become possible to stop gobbling up countryside in urban "development", and much more.
Most of these are benefits in any terms. Some appear as negatives only in the false accounting of conventional economics, which measures all exchange of money as a "good", even if the "good" is the medical care of road accident victims, or scraping oil off beaches.
Christopher Padley
Green Party Population
Policy Working Group
Market Rasen, Lincolnshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments