Letter: Fears about sludge lagoons unfounded
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I refer to the article on the proposed lagoon at Iken, Suffolk ('Lagoons darken village horizon', 22 September).
The objectors to the sludge lagoons accept them as part of an environmentally friendly activity. The issue is that they want them located elsewhere - yet another case of Nimby. One of our challenges is to persuade the objectors that their fears are groundless and that their sympathy for our agricultural service can be extended reasonably to local activities.
We do not believe we have contravened any UK or European regulations and have followed established guidelines at all times, in preparing the plans and in contemplating the proposed method of operation. We have met the objectors on several occasions and they have yet to substantiate their claim that we are contravening the law and neither we nor the Department of the Environment have heard anything from the EC.
Sludge lagoons are an essential feature in providing a service to agriculture that helps to reduce the need for artificial fertilisers. Indeed, their use was foreseen in the formulation of the current regulations.
The lagoons are low profile, earth-embanked features that quickly blend into the landscape. We could not be in breach of regulations concerning pollution because the lagoons are designed to be non-polluting, being lined to prevent leakage.
We successfully operate sludge lagoons in all parts of the Anglian Region without complaint from local people and there is no doubt that use of sewage sludge on agricultural land is sensible and environmentally friendly.
While the views of the residents in Iken are respected and have influenced our plans for execution of the project, they will only be satisfied if we move the lagoons.
Yours faithfully,
JOHN SANSBY
Divisional Manager
Anglian Water Services Limited
Colchester, Essex
24 September
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments