Letter: Farming fat cat doubles intake
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Gavin Strang's desire to reduce subsidy to large farming businesses and your research into farming subsidies ("Farming fat cats reap a rich harvest", 29 November) raise a cartload of issues.
Large farmers do receive large subsidies, but not disproportionately to the area farmed. Large farmers also have more hired labour. My recent, at this stage tentative, research, based on data supplied by Cambridge University, suggests that a fall in support by say 10 per cent would reduce employment by a little over 10 per cent. Agriculture is one of the biggest industries in the UK and in many areas it is the only source of employment.
UK farming has undergone significant structural change, and pain, compared with our European neighbours. It would be a pity if these hard-won advantages were lost.
Efficient production with reduced dependency on support for food production should allow any government to target resources to achieve its, or more importantly the electorate's, objectives. These may be cheaper food, maintenance of the environment, employment, organic farming, lower taxes or whatever.
SIMON WARD
Cottenham, Cambridgeshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments