Letter: Families still count
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Polly Toynbee is right to argue against importing the earned income tax credit scheme for low income families from the United States, and in favour of substantially increasing child benefit. But the rest of her package - going back to joint taxation of couples and taxing child benefit - would be moves in the wrong direction.
To apply joint taxation to married couples only would be discriminatory. But the idea of the Inland Revenue administering a cohabitation rule is a nightmare. It turns into an administrative absurdity once the increasing fluidity of relationships is taken into account.
To point out that means- tested benefits are assessed on a family basis does not justify a return to joint taxation; instead, we should be exploring how to move towards individually-based benefits, as the European Commission has recently suggested. If we are worried about the widening gap between rich and poor, there are plenty of ways to increase redistribution from the better-off - whether married, cohabiting or single - without abandoning independent taxation.
It would be a mistake to tax child benefit: it would be rather odd to get only families with children to pay for an increase in the one benefit specifically for families with children. In addition, under joint taxation, many husbands could be paying tax on the child benefit received by their wives. The resentment this caused could result in calls for the reintroduction of child tax allowances, paid via the main earner - usually the man. And then we really would be back where we started.
FRAN BENNETT
Oxford
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments