Letter: False alarm over Portillo's Euro-warning
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your report of Michael Portillo's weekend remarks about the 1994 European Elections Manifesto (11 October) misinterprets what the Chief Secretary actually said. Speaking on Frost on Sunday, Mr Portillo did not say that Conservative candidates supporting 'Euro-federalism' should or would be deselected. Rather, he noted that any conflict between the manifesto and the views of particular candidates would be a matter for the candidates themselves, their local associations and the party chairman.
It is difficult to see how the Chief Secretary could have gone beyond this general and unexceptionable proposition, since the Conservative manifesto for the European elections next year has not been written. There is every reason to believe that it will be a positive, balanced and constructive document which is acceptable to a wide span of opinion within the party.
This is perhaps an appropriate occasion to offer a general comment on the vexed question of 'federalism'. I am, of course, aware that to some politicians and commentators in this country this word means no more and no less than 'excessive centralism'. If we are clear that this is what we are talking about - as the Prime Minister has been on many occasions in the House of Commons - then, of course, the Conservative Party, unlike its opponents, is an anti- federalist party.
But it should not be forgotten that the European Community, of which Britain has been a member since 1973 - with its exclusive competences, decision-making by majority vote and supranational laws - is an essentially federal structure. Such arrangements are crucial to both the establishment and success of the Single Market.
In consequence, we should beware of using anti-federalist rhetoric that might cast doubt on our party's commitment to the European Community of the Treaty of Rome, the Single European Act and those parts of the Maastricht treaty to which we have already committed ourselves.
Yours faithfully,
CHRISTOPHER PROUT
Leader, Conservatives in the
European Parliament
London, SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments