Letter: Fall-out from Hiroshima

Mr Peter Lomas
Monday 07 August 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Richard Lloyd Parry ("The day the world changed", 4 August) reports a "widespread belief" among the victims of the Hiroshima bombing and their relatives "that genetic defects caused by radiation would be visited on the second generation." However, he adds, no evidence for this belief has emerged "in 50 years of tests and observation".

Yet this conclusion cannot be regarded as definitive. The US National Academy of Sciences report (1980) on the biological effects of radiation estimates that "irregularly inherited genetic changes" would persist for ten generations. The foremost authority on the subject, Professor Joseph Rotblat, writes:

Global fall-out [from a major nuclear war] would result in long-term damage in all countries; it would be expressed in an increased incidence of cancers and of genetic defects in future generations. ... Not only the inhabitants of the combatant countries, but virtually the whole population of the world, and their descendants, would be victims of a nuclear war. (Nuclear Radiation in Warfare, SIPRI 1981, p. 149, last emphasis added).

Yours sincerely,

Peter Lomas

St Andrews, Fife

5 August

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in