Letter: Exams are a test of memory, not of thinking capacity
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I read Lincoln Allison's article 'Only examinations truly pass the test' (1 June) the day before the final of my Final Examinations, where I expect, like the Eddie in his illustration, I will get a lower second.
Like many others, I have spent three years discovering that the more I learn, the less I know. In 1991, I would have sat down and written fluently about the subject on which I had heard lectures, engaged in tutorials and read in learned journals and textbooks. As the course progressed, however, I was taught to think and analyse and criticise.
When confronted with an examination paper now, I find it very difficult to regurgitate theories and the names attached to them, to think of appropriate analogies and, even worse, to propound my own theories, which have taken such a battering over three years. As for reaching a conclusion, when I have seen the deconstruction of the conclusions of those far more eminent than I by those more learned, how can I have the audacity? And yet that is what one is expected to do, over a wide range of subjects.
In the real world, outside academia, one is under pressure, yes, and one has to be capable of rapid deductive reasoning; but it is expected that the information systems that support such reasoning will be readily to hand, or at least available for reference. Examinations are largely a test of memory, not thinking capacity, which is why I am deeply grateful that my degree is assessed half on essays and half on examination marks - otherwise I'd be lucky to get a pass.
As for whether passing exams produces good career fodder, I would suggest this is probably only for those who are going to continue to take exams for their foreseeable future, or to prepare others to do so - academia is a self-perpetuating oligarchy. Many a textbook I have read suggests that academics discovered how to rescramble the work of their peers and predecessors long before students thought of it, and have made a pretty good living out of it]
Yours truly,
PAMELA D. PLAYLE-
MITCHELL
University of Lancaster
Lancaster
1 June
(Photograph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments