Letter: Exams and training to select judges

Professor John Griffith
Wednesday 28 October 1992 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Judges should be appointed (pace Lord Williams) from barristers or solicitors under 30 years of age who have gained admission by competitive public examination to a college for the judiciary, whence they would qualify after two years' training ('Selection of judges 'farcical' ', 24 October).

Yours truly,

JOHN GRIFFITH

Marlow,

Buckinghamshire

24 October

The writer is emeritus professor of public law, University of London.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in