Letter: Even `good' employers need trade unions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your opinion (leading article, 10 September), "Yes we need unions, but unions need to change", is based on a fundamental misunderstanding.
It is not just because some employers "fail to reach the gold standard" that trade unions are needed. It is because, as you say, "conflicts between those who create jobs and those who take jobs are ineluctable". I write as a former trade union official, who spent much of his working life dealing with workplace safety and health hazards. Statutory national standards of occupational safety and health are set by governments, not by employers or employees. Both sides of industry have an equal right to be consulted in their formulation. Employers, even good employers, of whom there are many, cannot be accepted as sole arbiters. That is one important reason why trade unions are necessary.
C R DALE
Saffron Walden, Essex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments