Letter: European elections: lessons for the Government
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Charles Kennedy was right to criticise Peter Snow's analysis of the European votes on the BBC's Europe Decides programme last night. Mr Snow's obsession with measuring the outcome of the European elections against the results of the last four general elections seemed faintly ridiculous and irrelevant, given his computerised inability to show the national trend in comparison to the 1989 Euro-elections results.
As Mr Snow himself pointed out, although last night's results demonstrated Labour's current popularity over the Tories, the European elections have traditionally represented a mid-term swing away from the ruling government. Indeed, the BBC's reasonable coverage of the results on the other EU member states showed this to have been the trend in all but one country, Italy, where the government is enjoying a honeymoon period. How could the BBC justify a continued direct comparison with the 1992 general election results?
The low Euro-election turnout also bucks the general election trend. This is something that both new and returning MEPs must address over the next five years. In its ever-increasing thirst for new powers, the European Parliament must concentrate on putting more time, money and energy into marketing itself in the member states at a level above that of the single partisan MEP. It is little wonder that turnouts of 30 per cent or below are to be expected if the parliament, as an institution, only gives itself a short blast of exposure in the four weeks before an election.
Yours faithfully,
STEPHEN M. KEHOE
Brussels
13 June
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments