Letter: EU 3per cent 'limit' on budget deficit is a fallacy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Gavyn Davies ( 29 April) is guilty of perpetuating the myth that Maastricht imposes a limit of 3 per cent on budget deficits. Three per cent is merely a reference value, such that the EU makes an evaluation of the situation of states exceeding this value in order to determine whether their deficit can be considered to be excessive.
Such an evaluation must, under the treaty, take into account such factors as "government investment expenditure" (ie public investment is allowed even over 3 per cent) and "the medium-term economic and budgetary position" (ie counter cyclical deficits are also allowed). It requires a qualified majority (more than two-thirds of the votes) for Council to decide that a deficit is excessive.
A combination of Euro-sceptics (who like to portray the Maastricht convergence criteria as impossibly rigid) and fiscal conservatives (who want to reduce public deficits come what may) have led to much of the press referring to the 3 per cent as an absolute limit. It is a shame that your specialist columnist appears also to have been taken in by this fallacy.
Richard Corbett
Antwerp, Belgium
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments