Letter: Ethics ignored at the hospital morgue
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I read 'Children's growth hormone made from glands of infected corpses' (16 August) and the ensuing letters with a degree of puzzlement and concern. No one has mentioned one aspect of the subject. Ivan Biddle, the mortuary technician cited, is said to have 'collected the pituitary from every corpse he dealt with' in Barnet General Hospital. Surely this raises some questions. Should mortuary technicians have carte blanche in their treatment of corpses? Should they be expected to pay heed to ethical guidelines? Should relatives of a deceased person be asked whether the mortuary technicians might remove the pituitary and other bodily parts from the corpse? I suggest that these questions should at least be broached.
Yours faithfully,
JAMES T. WESTLAND
Nottingham
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments