Letter: Essex social workers are innocent
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.LYNN BARBER suggests that social workers should only be appointed to posts involving responsibility for children if they have children themselves. No doubt she would agree that no one should become a teacher unless they have children. And bald hairdressers are beyond the pale.
It is tragic but true that many children in Britain suffer terrible abuse. Their rights cannot therefore be above scrutiny or above the law. The mistakes of social sevices departments are well- publicised, but social workers are invested with statutory powers, because a difficult and unpalatable problem exists.
Lynn Barber referred directly to the recent case in Essex, highlighted in the Spectator. However, the Department of Health has exonerated the social services department, saying social workers acted within the letter and spirit of the law.
Terry Philpot
Editor, Community Care
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments