Letter: English teachers oppose government-prescribed book list
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Bryan Appleyard's invective against English teachers ('The loose canons of academe', 16 March) is insulting and backward looking. If Mr Appleyard were to spend any time in a contemporary classroom he would realise just how out of touch with the real world he is.
The educationalists on the Schools Curriculum and Assessment Authority English committee who won a vote to make the book list less prescriptive include classroom teachers who know the reality of working with children. What they are asking for is a sentence to be appended to the book list to say that teachers may teach texts they judge to be equivalent to those on the list.
Why should this very modest proposal deserve to be treated with 'derision and contempt'? English teachers, the vast majority of whom are well-qualified, specialist, graduates, should be free to determine the what and when of teaching Shakespeare or any other writer. This concept is known in higher education as academic freedom, and what is good for universities is good for primary and secondary schools.
Most worrying are Mr Appleyard's prejudices against the study of the media and what he terms 'bland multiculturalism'. As a teacher of media studies and English, I know that there are many benefits in applying concepts from one academic area to another. For example, the study of genre and representation in literature provides new insights into texts and the way they work for their readers. As for 'bland multiculturalism', I presume Mr Appleyard prefers robust nationalism and aspires to a cultural and academic cleansing of English literature.
It is a small consolation that, should this ridiculous list become law, I shall be able to tell my pupils that I had nothing to do with the decision. As my class of 14-year-olds plods through a 'classic' of English literature such as Little Women I shall stifle any protest by reading them Bryan Appleyard's article so they know who thought that it was a vital part of their education to read that book.
Yours,
ANDY GIBBONS
Organiser
Campaign for Raising Standards in English
London, SW17
17 March
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments