Letter: Energy tax under discussion

Tom Spencer Mep
Monday 27 May 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Energy tax

under discussion

Sir: Your otherwise excellent report (20 May) on the European Union's certain failure to meet the greenhouse gas emission targets for 2000, which it set itself in Rio, makes the assertion that the European Commission proposal for a CO2 energy tax has been stalemated "largely because of fierce opposition from Britain".

As parliamentary rapporteur on the CO2 tax, I can assure you that the revised Commission proposal for a flexible and optional CO2/energy tax is alive and still under discussion. This directive echoes the approach being taken on a single currency.

Within an agreed structure designed to protect the integrity of the Single Market, those member states who wish could proceed with a CO2/energy tax, with other states joining as they become convinced of the utility of such a tax.

The villain in the story of the attempted stalemate of the CO2/energy tax is not the British government, but the concerted, well-financed international campaign mounted by the fossil fuel industries, led by the oil industry. When in 2010, the world's public wants to know why the political system has been so slow in putting in place measures to inhibit climate disruption, their attention will rightly focus on the role of the oil companies.

TOM SPENCER, MEP

(Surrey, Con)

Churt, Surrey

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in