LETTER: Electoral reform: rhetoric or 'new' politics?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.rom Ms Lindsay Cooke
Sir: What is important about Labour's commitment to a referendum on voting reform for the Commons ("Labour unease over electoral 'U-turn'", 14 August) is not whether such reform is or is not a good idea. It is critical to any evaluation of just how "new" Labour is because it recognises that the decision on an issue so central to the relationship between government and governed belongs to the people, not the politicians.
It was under John Smith's leadership that Labour committed itself to the referendum. In an interview with Andrew Marr on 29 July 1993, John Smith gave his reasons:
I am not in favour of changing to PR, but I have made a commitment to a referendum and I mean that ... I don't think MPs should decide it, I genuinely think this is a case for a referendum because people elected under system A are not the people to decide whether it should be system A or system B.
Asked whether he would commit himself to legislating for PR if that was the way the referendum went, he replied:
Absolutely. No point in having a referendum if you ignore its results.
This is principled, value-based "new" politics in action, rather than in rhetoric. We look forward to an unequivocal endorsement from the Labour conference in October.
Yours faithfully,
Lindsay Cooke
Charter 88
London, EC1
15 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments