LETTER: Elected mayors: visible leaders or puppets on a string?

Professor Michael Chisholm
Saturday 16 December 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Professor Michael Chisholm

Sir: Before we get too excited about the idea of directly elected mayors as a means for revitalising local government, remember that central government exercises direct and very tight control over more than 90 per cent of each local authority's budget.

A mayor dancing to central government puppet strings will look remarkably like a council doing the same thing. To make local government more genuinely accountable to the local electorate, local authorities must have greater control over their finance. Three reforms are needed. Reduce the proportion of local government funds derived from central government (currently about 80 per cent). Remove the capping of expenditure. And, third, remove the council tax from public expenditure as defined for control purposes. This is the necessary condition for the first two reforms.

Given the absolute control over local authority borrowing and capital expenditure that exists, there is no macro-economic justification for the Treasury insisting on controlling the level of council tax. The Audit Commission and other mechanisms exist to ensure that the tax is set at reasonable levels, and if these plus periodic elections are not enough, how about local referenda?

One could cynically say that the proposal for elected mayors is yet another structural diversion while the steady centralisation of power continues.

Yours faithfully,

Michael Chisholm

Cambridge

13 December

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in