Letter: 'Elderly' mothers and Down's syndrome tests

Dr Elizabeth M. Pearce
Friday 21 August 1992 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I was interested to read Janet Daniels's letter (18 August) about the introduction of the Bart's screening test to aid in the detection of Down's syndrome babies.

As an 'elderly' mother I certainly agree with Ms Daniels's suggestion that tests such as amniocentesis should still be available to older women. I had such a test in my 40th year when I was expecting my first child and, having been made only too aware of the statistical risks of carrying a Down's syndrome child at that age, only really began to 'enjoy' my pregnancy when I knew my child was all right.

But as Ms Daniels points out, by the time the results of an amniocentesis are available, the pregnancy is relatively advanced. When I became pregnant again, at 42, I opted for chorionic villus sampling (CVS) rather than an amniocentesis. Although the miscarriage rate is said to be higher (two in 100 against one in 100), the test is carried out at nine to 10 weeks and the results are available within days.

If, therefore, a woman decides to terminate a Down's syndrome pregnancy, at least at such an early stage she can be spared some of the anguish of a later operation.

Yours faithfully,

ELIZABETH M. PEARCE

Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire

19 August

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in