Letter: Eight questions on 'friendly fire' money
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I read your news item about the offer by William Perry, the US Secretary of Defence, of dollars 100,000 to the relatives of the British officers who were recently killed over Iraq by US 'friendly fire' (27 August). Were Parliament sitting, these are the questions I would be putting down:
1. What advice is our Ministry of Defence offering to the relatives?
2. Have the US authorities completed their inquiries, and what conclusions have they reached about the responsibilities of all those concerned for firing at the helicopters?
3. Are those responsible for these deaths to be prosecuted by the US authorities, as earlier reports indicated was possible?
4. Would acceptance of the dollars 100,000 being offered preclude the relatives from suing those who may be found responsible for the deaths?
5. Are similar offers of a similar sum being made to all the other victims, whether US nationals or non-US nationals?
6. Did the US authorities discuss Mr Perry's offer with the British authorities before making it and if so, did the latter gave their approval to the US approach to the relatives?
7. What pensions are British taxpayers due to pay to the dependants of those killed?
8. What law, according to the Government's legal advisers, is applicable: US or UK?
Yours faithfully,
KENNET
House of Lords
London, SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments