Letter: Education: is there room at the top for working-class children?

Mr A. Freeman
Thursday 27 August 1992 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Professor A. H. Halsey's findings that the proportion of working-class students going to university or polytechnic has 'scarcely increased during the last 20 years', should surprise no-one who has risen from a working-class background (report, 26 August).

His conclusion displays the kind of unintended condescension which ensures that many working-class people will never seek to improve their minds. His claim that 'resources are much better in some homes than others' while obviously true, is certainly not the reason. Many working-class people simply do not wish their children to 'be better' than themselves and loathe the idea that their offspring might be better off financially. There is also fear that higher education might affect political beliefs and few things among the traditional working-class evoke such contempt as the 'working-class Tory'.

For many years I worked in factories and met very few people who sent their children to university. This had more to do with attitude than money. The Twenties, Thirties and Forties spawned a working-class generation who believed higher education was beyond their grasp - intellectually, financially and politically unacceptable. My father gained a scholarship to grammar school, but was denied entry by his parents. He subsequently believed that higher education was beyond any of his own children and did nothing to encourage it.

Opportunities for working-class students were never better than during the last 20 or 30 years (with the exception of the last five years, I guess). Their parents were better off financially and the grants available comparatively higher than today, and yet the proportion of their children going on to higher education remained the same.

During those years nowhere in these isles was inverted snobbery more entrenched than in the working class. So-called 'middle-class' values were deeply despised and mistrusted, perhaps because many middle-class people are actually working class who aspired to better themselves, and subsequently tried to camouflage their origins.

Yours faithfully,

A. FREEMAN

Barnet, Hertfordshire

26 August

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in