Letter: EC must be subject to the control of its people
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Twenty-nine years ago, in an inaugural lecture, I suggested that the increasing concentration of power at the state level was movement in the wrong direction. What was needed was as much devolution of powers as possible to below state levels. If this were not done people would feel powerless to influence their conditions of life, they would become alienated and apathetic, social values would decline, and politics and politicians would be viewed with growing contempt. But equally, some functions required management at levels above the state - questions of external relations, military affairs, and economics among them.
In the lull and exhaustion of post-crisis Maastricht and the exchange rate mechanism, it seems to me that the time is ripe for consideration of these fundamental issues. What is required is a commission of representatives from the 12 member states of the EC whose task it should be to recommend, in the light of EC objectives, how the performance of functions should be distributed at EC level, at state level, and at sub-state level, and what kind of institutional arrangements should be made at the level of the Community. Evidently, arrangements within the member states would vary, but principles should be clearly formulated.
The membership of the commission should be of persons with a deep understanding of constitutional principles and of politics, and with some practical experience, but not politicians who are conditioned by their role to state-centred viewpoints. It should be as small as possible: 12 optimal, 24 maximum. It should of course seek advice from persons of relevant skills, and from different countries.
Without a fundamental inquiry of this kind politicians will be able to do no other than repeat the botched horse-trading that produced Maastricht, or the creation of structures without consistent and realistic purpose, such as the ERM.
Yours faithfully,
P. A. REYNOLDS
Borwick,
Carnforth
11 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments