Letter: Duped by China
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.DESPITE the fact that Chinese suppression of political dissent in regions such as Tibet and Xinjiang is increasing year on year, the Government assures us that, rather than backing UN condemnation of such oppression, it is only "constructive engagement" with the People's Republic that will ensure political change.
Most human rights organisations agree that such political appeasement - whether the retention of Most Favoured Nation trading status or the uncoupling of trade from human rights - has a direct and immediate influence on the political climate in China - for the worse.
Our increasing economic involvement in China has given the Communist Party there a large stick with which to beat us, simply because Britain needs China's emerging markets and cheap labour more than China needs Britain's trade. China, not the West, has the upper hand in such "engagement".
As the recent row over Chris Patten's book has demonstrated, it is not China's political climate that is being changed by "constructive engagement", it is ours. We seem increasingly willing to give up our own human-rights principles and restrict our own democratic freedoms, in order to secure an economic foothold in the Middle Kingdom. The Labour Party's political naivety and weakness on this issue is lamentable. The Chinese government must be laughing at us, all the way to the bank.
Dr MARTIN A MILLS,
School of African and Asian Studies
University of Sussex
Brighton
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments