Letter: Drugs policy pushes Bolivia closer to war
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Behind the photo of rioting coca farmers (7 September), lie events which threaten to plunge poor but peaceful Bolivia into civil war. At fault is international drug-control policy which increasingly risks damaging democracy and human rights as greatly as the illegal drug trade it seeks to defeat.
There is a long-standing agreement between the Bolivian government and the farmers' unions: farmers will eradicate coca voluntarily when alternative livelihoods become available. Numerous studies show that forced eradication merely compels impoverished peasants to replant coca elsewhere. This cancels the effect of eradication and prompts more deforestation.
But, eager to demonstrate 'success' in reducing drug supply, the Clinton administration is pressing for rapid coca eradication - with or without the farmers' agreement. Unless the Bolivian government destroys 3,000 hectares before October, it will lose millions of dollars of US aid.
Bolivia's President Sanchez clearly feels he has no choice but to ignore both Bolivian law and common sense, and eradicate coca forcibly. In so doing he undermines Bolivia's own peace and democracy.
Since late August, peaceful peasant protests have been viciously repressed, with at least one death from torture. Elected farmers' leaders have been arbitrarily detained, along with development experts advising peasant projects, including one British agency worker.
The tragedy is that forcible eradication of coca will do nothing to stem the cocaine trade, so long as demand for cocaine in the US and Europe remains high, and international economic policies deprive Andean peasant farmers of viable substitutes.
Yours faithfully,
ANDY ATKINS
Drug Trade and Development Programme
Catholic Institute for
International Relations
London, N1
7 September
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments