Letter: Don't blame the Germans: the fault lies with the British PM and his Chancellor
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: It is a mistake to blame either the Germans or the world situation for the currency debacle, which has possibly cost the taxpayer pounds 1bn in wasted intervention. The problem was that, at the old exchange rate, budgetary policy was hopelessly out of balance. The budget was in deficit but, given the state of the economy, it did not seem likely that the Government would be prepared to raise taxes. The difficulties were compounded by the suggestion that maintaining the exchange rate was simply a question of credibility and the belief that ministers could turn back the tide of economic reality.
Now that devaluation is happening, the Government must grasp the nettle of budgetary policy. A sharp reduction in the budget deficit is needed, and the new exchange rate should be chosen so that overall demand remains broadly unchanged (or is increased very slightly). This would put the economy on a sound footing without leading to any resumption of inflation. It would provide a sound basis for economic recovery.
Independence for the Bank of England should not be part of the package. That would only support the mistaken belief that monetary policy can be handled independently of budgetary policy.
Yours faithfully,
M. R. WEALE
Faculty of Economics and Politics
University of Cambridge
Cambridge
17 September
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments