LETTER : Does BSE in the Sunday joint cause Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Dr H. C. Grant
Sir: Here are some important additions to your list of the first 10 years of BSE (25 October):
1981: The Government removed the guidelines, in place for years, on the recycling of dead sheep for feeding to cattle. The agrifeed industry immediately reduced the temperature and the time required for processing of the sheep carcasses. But most importantly, the sheep brains were no longer dissolved because the expensive fat solvents (the brain - the infective organ - is very fatty) were no longer included in the mixture. Four years later, the first cow went down with BSE.
1986: The government vets who had identified BSE and its origins were told to keep quiet about it and not to publish their interesting papers on the subject - or else. Furthermore, far from the infective feed being banned immediately, farmers continued to be encouraged to feed this high protein material to their cattle for two years and the disease spread all over the UK.
1988: The Government stated, and still states, that "infected" livestock are destroyed. This is incorrect: only visibly infected livestock are destroyed, leaving an unknown number of equally infective but unidentifiable animals. There is no test to identify them and the only scientist to have perfected such a test has been prevented by the Government from using it.
Yours faithfully,
H. C. Grant
London, NW3
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments