Letter: Distortions under a supplementary vote system

Mr Laurence Mann
Thursday 22 April 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The Plant Commission's unfortunate preference for the supplementary vote as an electoral system for the United Kingdom presages a rejection of any mode of proportional representation by the Labour Party.

The party has never at any stage of its existence actually obtained a majority of the votes cast in an election. It is clear that until there is acceptance by that party that it can only justly participate in government as part of a coalition, it has no reason to abandon its allegiance to systems of election that are deliberately distortive of the popular vote.

The supplementary vote is such a distortive system. As well as the inadequacies highlighted by your article (21 April), its proponent, Dale Campbell-Savours, has forgotten (or has not pointed out) that many people vote either Labour or Conservative only because they 'don't want to let the other side in'.

SV will allow them to vote Liberal Democrat as their first choice, safe in the knowledge that their second choice may still count if their first does not. SV is likely to result, over the course of one or two elections, in a distortion in favour of the Liberal Democrats; who have at least promised a genuine proportional system.

In the meantime, while the Labour Party clings to the remote hope that its number may come up in the next electoral lottery, Rome burns.

Yours faithfully,

LAURENCE MANN

Twickenham, Middlesex

21 April

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in