Letter: Dissection: a respectful voyage of discovery

Professor P. N. Dilly
Thursday 09 July 1992 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: All methods of disposal of the dead have their emotional problems, and David Delvin's out-of- date account of a dissecting room contributes nothing ('Beware, Aunt Edna, if you give your all', 7 July). He has obviously not been in a dissecting room for years. At St George's, we dissect 25 to 30 bodies a year. Most of our bodies have had their eyes removed, so the donors have given not only their bodies, but the potential gift of sight to a blind person.

No one leaves the bodies lying around naked; they would dry out, harden and mummify. Bodies embalmed by modern techniques are so pliable that at least 10 of ours are used each year so that highly qualified and skilled surgeons can investigate the anatomy required to advance techniques in such fields as cardiac resuscitation and artificial hip placements under realistic conditions.

Like all good departments, when our students dissect, we keep the removed organs in individual, identified storage. The portrayal that dissection involves chopping the body up into unidentifiable little bits is ludicrous. It is all very well for Dr Delvin to sensationalise, making donations more difficult - he has done his training. But much has changed since his antiquated experience. Today we teach clinically relevant anatomy, the anatomy that practising doctors need to know, not the ultimate detail for surgeons.

When examining a living patient, the dissecting room experience allows you to know what organs are under your hands, and that is what distinguishes a doctor from a quack.

The donation of your body for dissection means that future doctors, dentists, nurses, physiotherapists, radiographers and surgeons will all have better training. After all, the alternatives to donation are without any contribution to humanity: to rot, to burn or to be eaten by fish.

Our students and staff treat our subjects with respect, fully aware of the traumatic sacrifice made by their living relatives. Many attend the annual memorial service for these rather special people, the donors.

Yours sincerely,

P. N. DILLY

Professor and Chairman

Anatomy

St George's Hospital Medical

School

London, SW17

7 July

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in