Letter: Disaster is not inevitable from population growth

Mr Martin Anderson
Friday 25 February 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: On Tuesday you reported on the dangers of over-population (22 February). Perhaps this taboo subject can at last be taken out of the closet. Too many of our problems, from global warming to the protection of Sites of Special Scientific Interest, are fundamentally a consequence of too many people. It surely isn't rational to aim at small reductions in the damage we are doing while refusing to recognise the impact of a further doubling of the global population.

Perhaps at last we will see the political parties put population on the agenda. We should be aiming for a reduction in the UK population to somewhere around 12 million - the sort of number that we could support indefinitely from our own resources.

A serious programme, based on persuasion not coercion, could set an example for other developed countries and give us the moral authority, and the experience, to help the developing world to address their population problems. In many ways it is more urgent that we trim our numbers because of the profligacy with which we consume the world's resources.

We have a stark choice: control our numbers, or condemn future generations to misery.

Your faithfully,

MARTIN ANDERSON

Newbury,

Berkshire

23 February

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in