Letter: Development of ideas at the UN

Professor Sir Hans Singer
Wednesday 15 March 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Professor Sir Hans Singer

Sir: Hamish McRae dislikes the UN and prefers the World Bank ("The UN's poverty of ideas", 9 March). He is, of course, fully entitled to his views; but his readers are also entitled to know that the proposal for a UN Economic Security Council, which he derides, has quite recently been put forward again and supported by detailed arguments in the Report of the Commission on Global Governance.

This commission was chaired by the Prime Minister of Sweden, Ingvar Carlsson, and Sir Shridath Ramphal, the former Secretary General of the Commonwealth Secretariat. Members of the commission included a former President of the World Bank (Barber Conable of the United States), Lord Judd, and Sir Brian Urquhart, the most senior former British UN staff member. One should have thought that with such respectable sponsorship the proposal deserves to be taken seriously. Would Hamish McRae deny that there are economic and social as well as political and military causes of conflict and crisis?

As for "the UN's poverty of ideas", I think the record speaks for itself. Deprived of resources and political support as it is, the UN has nevertheless produced a series of new initiatives which have had a number of results, ranging from the establishment of a soft aid facility within the World Bank (IDA) and the Compensatory Financing Facility in the IMF to a rethinking of the structural adjustment programmes as a result of the Unicef report on "Adjustment with a Human Face".

Alas, without resources and support, the UN can do little more than produce ideas to be taken up by others. The 20/20 proposal presently discussed in Copenhagen is the most recent example of such an idea.

Yours faithfully,

HANS SINGER

Institute of Development Studies

University of Sussex

Brighton

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in